<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenSolaris ZFS replication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brentrjones.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=45" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45</link>
	<description>Technical writings and consulting services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:18:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice</title>
		<link>http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>Why not dispense with cron and have the script enter a never-ending loop to do the snapshot? Then the next snapshot always begins immediately after the last one finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not dispense with cron and have the script enter a never-ending loop to do the snapshot? Then the next snapshot always begins immediately after the last one finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>ahh i figured it out i had to run the file through dos2unix</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahh i figured it out i had to run the file through dos2unix</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-1782</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 00:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45#comment-1782</guid>
		<description>i just downloaded your script to play with and when i run

root@CAM-SAN-T21:~# ./replicate.ksh SAN/ISCSI/cam-vmfs-samba SAN/Replication/cam-vmfs-samba 10.66.227.200
: unknown option</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just downloaded your script to play with and when i run</p>
<p>root@CAM-SAN-T21:~# ./replicate.ksh SAN/ISCSI/cam-vmfs-samba SAN/Replication/cam-vmfs-samba 10.66.227.200<br />
: unknown option</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45#comment-933</guid>
		<description>Sturban,
Correct, block level activity gets recorded by AVS, and sent to your secondary node.
Supposedly you can just do manual synchronizations periodically instead of real-time, but then what benefit does AVS have over ZFS snapshots...
It would just add a lot of complexity. We had a few Sun engineers come to our site, and dissuaded us from AVS for those exact reasong (though Sun&#039;s sales people said AVS was the best thing since sliced bread)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sturban,<br />
Correct, block level activity gets recorded by AVS, and sent to your secondary node.<br />
Supposedly you can just do manual synchronizations periodically instead of real-time, but then what benefit does AVS have over ZFS snapshots&#8230;<br />
It would just add a lot of complexity. We had a few Sun engineers come to our site, and dissuaded us from AVS for those exact reasong (though Sun&#8217;s sales people said AVS was the best thing since sliced bread)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sturban</title>
		<link>http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45&#038;cpage=1#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>sturban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentrjones.com/?p=45#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Is that true about the AVS and ZFS resilvering?? -I was considering AVS but that has put me off considerably now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that true about the AVS and ZFS resilvering?? -I was considering AVS but that has put me off considerably now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
